Web12. maj 2024. · Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [1978 SC 597] Under Section 10(3)(c) of the Passport Act of 1967, the Passport Authority of India requested Maneka Gandhi to return her passport. She was denied the chance to be heard, therefore she filed a writ petition under Article 32, alleging that the passport authority's decision violated the … Web10. jun 2024. · Landmark judgment in Maneka Gandhi case. The judgment in Maneka Gandhi case ( Maneka Gandhi v Union of India: AIR 1978 SC 597) was a landmark judgment in the judicial history of India.It was a conscious attempt on the part of the Supreme Court (SC) in restoring the people’s faith in the judiciary which reached at its …

THE PUBLIC AND CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY CONUNDRUM: A CASE …

WebThe first was the decision in Express Newspapers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India 1959 SCR 12 where N.H Bhagwati, J., speaking on behalf of the Court, referred to the observations of Kania, C.J, in A.K Gopalan case and the decision in Ram Singh case but ultimately formulated the test of direct and inevitable effect for the purpose of adjudging ... Web07. dec 2024. · Union of India (1970) 2 SCC 298 and Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248 cases, the Court stressed that the rights to liberty, equality, expression, religion, and the cultural and educational rights are interrelated, and that although the right to freedom of expression “is absolutely sacrosanct in the sense that it is essential ... halloween traditions around the world czech

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, 1978 – Aishwarya Sandeep

WebState of Tamil Nadu [ (1974) 2 SCR 348], namely, that “from a positivistic point of view, equality is antithetic to arbitrariness. In fact equality and arbitrariness are sworn enemies; one belongs to the rule of law in a republic, while the other, to the whim and caprice of an absolute monarch. Where an act is arbitrary, it is implicit in it ... WebLivelihood Prior to Maneka Ghandi v Union of India the fundamental right to However, the generous attitude adopted since Maneka Ghandi has changed the jurisprudence in which right to livelihood is now a right protected under Article 21. ... 3 MLJ 281 Maneka Ghandi v Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597 Olga Tellis v Bombay Municipal Corp AIR 1986 SC 180. WebManeka Gandhi v. Union of India, 1978: This case required a substantial question of law and presented a much wider interpretation of Article 21. The petitioner was a journalist whose passport was confiscated by the Ministry of External Affairs, without providing any justifiable reasoning. She approached the court under Article 32 contending ... halloween traditions